Search Engine Script

Showing posts with label Convergence Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Convergence Review. Show all posts

Sunday, 20 November 2011

Screen Australia’s Playing for Keeps Report – the way forward for Australian computer gaming

Screen Australia, in the Playing for Keeps Report (November 2011) proposes two new options for computer games: and Interactive Entertainment (Games) Offset, which will provide indirect support for computer games through the taxation system, in a similar way to the existing tax offset for film and television production; and with Screen Australia also proposing that direct support for original online content through an Online Production Fund. These are important initiatives that I consider should be implemented.

Canada provides incentives to the entertainment software industry, which the Software Association of Canada’s May 2011 Report states as having provided 11% growth in the past 2 years for the games production industry with 17% projected growth in the next 2 years.  The Canadian provinces of Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia provide refundable tax credits on labour ranging from 17.5% to 37.5% of expenses; with the Federal government providing R&D tax credits. The Canadian success, and the declining number of independent games production companies, has motivated the U.K. games industry organisation, TIGA in a January 2011 Report to lobby for tax credits for computer games that meet a test directed to the cultural content and connection to European culture, heritage or creativity and the employment of European personnel.

The international games industry in the last decade has seen the emergence of substantial companies with consolidation among the major publishers/distributors of triple-A games titles. In this space, the focus on the publishing of a smaller number of big budget ‘franchise’ titles has impacted on the level of fee-for-service work being available for Australian studios. The high value of the Australian dollar also results in the major publishers/distributors looking for studios in lower cost countries or where there are substantial tax credits on labour cost and other investment incentives.

Screen Australia’s proposal can be seen as a valuable strategy to build and sustain the existing independent development studios that operate in Australia. While very small ‘garage’ start-up’s do not face barriers of entry, there are hurdles to building and sustaining development and production teams. The independent studios need to compete for fee-for-service work while funding development work on original IP projects.

The Software Association of Canada attributes the key business conditions that contribute to the success of the Canadian games industry is the internet and communications structure followed by availability of qualified personnel. The Canadian experience is that the “shares of total resources dedicated to downloadable, handheld, and PC games have been holding relatively steady, traditional console share has been declining, and is expected to continue to drop in response to rapid growth in resources dedicated to social, mobile, casual, and MMO (massively multiplayer online) gaming.”

The improvement in recent years in the digital platforms and Apple’s iOS and the Android technology, in particular the emergence of tablet devices and new generation smart phones, provides opportunities for independent publishers to directly distribute their titles through these digital platforms. The success of the ‘Angry Birds’ title shows that small independent games companies can build run-away successes with inventive and addictive gameplay.

The Interactive Entertainment (Games) Offset, proposed by Screen Australia, in the Playing for Keeps Report (November 2011) proposes a 20 per cent tax credit on eligible expenditure with a minimum expenditure threshold of $200,000.  This will provide part of the budget for games for social, mobile and casual gaming platforms.

The big budget, big teams and long production time frames of triple-A console games will usually require publisher financing. The proposed 30 per cent tax credit on eligible expenditure with a minimum expenditure threshold of $500,000 will provide larger independent games companies with part of the budget to attract the interest of international publishers for triple-A console games.

Screen Australia’s proposal for direct support for original online content through an Online Production Fund will provide a source of funding for those Australian independent development studios that are active in MMO (massively multiplayer online) gaming.

Having worked on "Frontiers of Utopia”, the first interactive project financed by the Australian Film Commission in the mid 1990s; then on web based projects; and having worked at Activision in recent times, I have see at first hand the evolution of online business strategies and the dramatic innovations that have allowed the games industry to undergo exponential growth so that consumer spending on computer games has, for the past decade, exceeded that spent on the music and movies. 

The economics of the development and financing of game titles is similar to the animation production – labour intensive with a high proportion of the cost of game development budgets being spent on artists, animators, designers and programmers.  Project development is always a process of fitting the pieces of the financing jig-saw together. Screen Australia, in the Playing for Keeps Report (November 2011), when read in conduction with the Software Association of Canada’s May 2011 Report, shows a pathway to build and sustain independent game studios in Australia.

Wednesday, 27 April 2011

Convergence Review Framing Paper – April 2011

Louise McElvogue, has been appointed as the 3rd member of the Convergence Review Committee (joining Glen Borham (Chair) and Malcolm Long).  Louise has worked in the United Kingdom including launch of ‘SeeSaw[1]  a video-on-demand (VOD) platform operated by Arqiva, which acquiring the remnants of Project ‘Kangaroo’ (the defunct broadband TV joint-venture from BBC Worldwide, ITV & Channel 4).  Louise previously worked on the launch of ‘4oD’, the Channel 4 (UK) VOD platform.[2] Louise McElvogue adds expertise in delivery of content on broadband systems which is a welcome addition as VOD and IPTV platforms have the potential to add the diversity and competition to the Australian media environment.

My blog of 12 April 2011 provided a review of the process of the Convergence Review 2011– the medium and the message.  The ‘Framing Paper’,[3] issued on 28 April 2011, is a step in the review process leading to the ‘Issues Paper” in June and hearings by the committee in July 2011.

Timeframe of Convergence Review
Framing paper submissions close:
10 June 2011
Emerging Issues paper released:
June 2011
Hearings:
July 2011
Detailed discussion papers:
August 2011
Final report:
March 2012

The ‘Framing Paper’ sets out the committee’s thinking on principles that should guide media and communications regulation in Australia, so as to provide a ‘starting point’ to indentify the objectives of the convergence review.  The principles identified in the Framing paper cover diversity and competition of media sources, a focus on Australian content, an acknowledgment of the importance of reflecting community standards in the delivery of content and addressing the interests of Australians as ‘consumers’ of content delivered on convergent media and the public interest in the allocation of spectrum by which important communication services operate:  The principles stated in the Framing Paper’ are:

DIVERSITY & COMPETITION

Principle 1: Australians should have access to a diversity of voices, views and information

Principle 2: The communications and media market should be innovative and competitive, while still ensuring outcomes in the interest of the Australian public


Local and Australian content

Principle 3: Australians should have access to Australian content that reflects and contributes to the development of national and cultural identity
Principle 4: Australians should have access to news and information of relevance to their local community


Community standards

Principle 5: Communications and media services available to Australians should reflect community standards and the views and expectations of the Australian public


Consumer and citizen rights

Principle 6: Australians should have access to the broadest range of content across platforms and services as possible

Principle 7: Service providers should provide the maximum transparency for consumers in how their service is delivered


Spectrum allocation

Principle 8: The government should seek to maximise the overall public benefit derived from the use of spectrum assigned for the delivery of media content and communications services

Having stated these principles the committee invites comment on the appropriateness of the principle as a starting point for the review, as well as asking for submissions on whether there are other principles that a relevant to the convergence review and inviting submissions as to what policy issues do the principles raise in relation to the evolving media and communications environment.[4]


The Convergence Review avoids the controversial topic of sporting rights; by coincidence the release of the Framing Paper occurred on the same day as press speculation that Australian Football League (AFL) television rights from 2012 to 2016 will be licensed to Fox Sports, Channel Seven and Telstra for A$1 billion.[5]

I will repeat a paragraph of my previous blog on the Terms of Reference of the Convergence Review: The Committee will address what are potentially contentious areas of regulation of audiovisual services.  The existing free-to-air and pay television services are facing new TV-like services such as IPTV, internet TV and video on demand, all of which emerging services compete with traditional free-to-air and pay TV services for viewers.  The treatment of advertising controls, programming classification and Australian content obligations that are directed to “the development of national and cultural identity” are likely to see the existing players arguing for positions that achieve a ‘level’ regulatory playing field across the different media technologies that can deliver TV or TV-like services.[6]  Both existing media players and emerging players will be focused on arguing for what they see as a conducive competitive environment for each play or industry sector.[7]

Further information is available at the DBCDE website http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/convergence_review#submissions

 

Twitter @DBCDEgov


Review secretariat - Tel: 02 6271 1255

convergence@dbcde.gov.au


[1] http://www.seesaw.com/
[2] http://www.channel4.com/programmes/4od
[3] http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/convergence_review
[4] Framing Paper, page 19.
[5] Caroline Wilson, AFL's billion dollar baby looms, Sydney Morning Herald, 28 April 20110: http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/afls-billion-dollar-baby-looms-20110428-1dxly.html#ixzz1Kn8zN55o
[6]  The Terms of Reference in paragraph 5 b. refer to “ensuring the ongoing production and distribution of local and Australian content that reflects and contributes to the development of national and cultural identity” http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/convergence_review/convergence_review_terms_of_reference
[7] The Terms of Reference in paragraph 5 a. refer to “the development and maintenance of a diverse, innovative, efficient and effective communications and media market that operates within an appropriately competitive environment and in the best interest of the Australian public” http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/convergence_review/convergence_review_terms_of_reference

Tuesday, 5 April 2011

review of the process of the Convergence Review 2011

The Federal government’s Convergence Review is getting underway.  The review does not involve a review of the National Broadband Network (NBN) legislation or the implementation of the NBN business plan to roll out the nation-wide high speed broadband network; with the support of the independent members the NBN legislation passing through the Federal parliament at the end of March so that political controversy is over;[1]  at least for a short time until the renewed public attention of the NBN when the termination of the construction tender hit the headlines this week.[2]


The Convergence Review also avoids the controversial topic of sporting rights – as the anti-siphoning list for sports was reviewed in 2010 to determine which AFL or NRL games get broadcast on free-to-air television and which games the pay TV platforms can bid for exclusive transmission rights.[3]  The terms of reference also narrow the scope of the review to delivery media and content issues and not to the regulatory environment for data and voice telephone services.[4]

The Federal government has directed to Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) to review the National Classification System to address emerging technologies.[5]  So that the Convergence Review is likely to pick up the ALRC recommendations as to the content of audience classifications for material, with the Review limited to covering the ‘take down’ notice procedures of Schedule 7 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth), which provides a scheme for dealing with prohibited content on the internet.  That was controversial at the time the ‘take down’ notice procedures were being developed, although the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) seem content with the  ‘light-touch’ approach to regulating prohibited content that exists in the current’ take-down’ notice system. 


Senator Stephen Conroy, the minister responsible for the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) has appointed two members of the Convergence Review Committee (Glen Boreham as chairman and Malcolm Long).  A third member is to be appointed - my guess is someone with extensive experience with telecommunications and/or cable television systems.

The members of the Committee have expertise that covers computers & IT, broadcast regulation & content creation; with Glen Boreham being the former managing director of IBM Australia and current chairman of Screen Australia; and Malcolm Long having experience in broadcast regulation at the Australian Communications and Media Authority and experience of subscription television channel management as well as content creation at the Australian Film Television and Radio School.

The Convergence Review Terms of Reference direct the Committee to review the operation of media and communications regulation in Australia so as to advise on the effectiveness of the regulatory regime in the convergent era. The Committee are to consider the operation of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, the Radiocommunications Act 1992 and the Telecommunications Act 1997, particularly as they relate to the regulation of content and converging content delivery platforms.[6]

The process of convergence is recognised as an ongoing process that impacts on the operators of the ‘pipelines’ through which data is delivered and the suppliers of the data (the ‘content’ being delivered via the pipelines) and the consumers of the content. The Convergence Review is directed to the regulatory environment for all forms of digital content including internet content delivered to consumers via broadband and wireless and delivery to all forms of digital devices including computers, internet enable television sets, mobile phones and other hand held digital devices.

The convergence of different communication technologies results in what were separate delivery systems for Internet, telephone calls and audiovisual programming being delivered on common telecommunications networks designed to carry any form of digital data. This triple play service is evolving into the so-called quadruple play service that integrates mobile phones and WiFi devices.  The Convergence Review is asked to determining “how best to manage the provision of media and communications services in this new environment.”[7]

The Committee will address what are potentially contentious areas of regulation of audiovisual services.  The existing free-to-air and pay television services are facing new TV-like services such as IPTV, internet TV and video on demand, all of which emerging services compete with traditional free-to-air and pay TV services for viewers.  The treatment of advertising controls, programming classification and Australian content obligations that are directed to “the development of national and cultural identity” are likely to see the existing players arguing for positions that achieve a ‘level’ regulatory playing field across the different media technologies that can deliver TV or TV-like services.[8]

Both existing media players and emerging players will be focused on arguing for what they see as a conducive competitive environment for each play or industry sector.[9]

Hard on the heels of getting the NBN legislation through the parliament the Federal government have given advance notice of the release of a National Digital Economy Strategy, which is intended to enable Australia firms to leverage the National Broadband Network (NBN) infrastructure so that Australia will become a world leading digital economy by 2020. The National Digital Economy Strategy is to be released at the end of May 2011.[10]

The DBCDE Convergence Background Paper (2010) describes the opportunities that brave new world of a convergent environment that will emerge with the continuing switch to digital-only television and the future rollout of the National Broadband Network.[11]


The Convergence Review formally commenced on 2 March 2011 with the opportunity for public submissions to be delivered the Committee in 2011.

Further information is available at the DBCDE website http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/convergence_review#submissions

 

Twitter @DBCDEgov


Review secretariat - Tel: 02 6271 1255

convergence@dbcde.gov.au



[1] The National Broadband Network Companies Bill 2010 and the Telecommunications Legislation Amendments (National Broadband Network Measures—Access Arrangements) Bill 2011 were by House of Representatives and the Senate on 28 March 2011. Media Release 28 March 2011 http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2011/152

[8]  The Terms of Reference in paragraph 5 b. refer to “ensuring the ongoing production and distribution of local and Australian content that reflects and contributes to the development of national and cultural identity” http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/convergence_review/convergence_review_terms_of_reference

[9] The Terms of Reference in paragraph 5 a. refer to “the development and maintenance of a diverse, innovative, efficient and effective communications and media market that operates within an appropriately competitive environment and in the best interest of the Australian public” http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/convergence_review/convergence_review_terms_of_reference